The difference in light capturing
In the climate chamber is now researched, financed by STW,
PT and LNV, which influence that had. That was possible by
using a plasma lamp (only recently available on the market)
in combination with filters and additional lamps. With that
the sunlight could be simulated very well (see fig 2) meanwhile
the light intensity stayed under control. Because for a reliable
comparison it has to keep the same of course.
The results are very clear. Young cucumber plants became
64% heavier (dry weight) under artificial sunlight then
under SON-T-light
and 128% heavier that under fluorescent light. That was not
because of the photosynthesis per unit leaf surface, because
this was exactly the same at a light strength of 100 µmol/m² ,
the applied light strength during the grow.
What was clearly different; the light capturing. That was
very clear to see from the plants. With fluorescent and SON-T-light
they stayed very flat; on the artificial sunlight the grow
up normal. The sunlight provides – in comparison with
fluorescent and SON-T-light – for longer stems, longer
leaf stems and thinner leaves. The plant invests more in leave
stretching than in leaf thickness. That tells that the surrounding
area increases faster. And that means more photosynthesis.
From the start these plants capturing more light. Thereby they
assimilated more. There by you get even faster leaf separation,
what leads to even more light capturing. It’s a profit
on profit affect.
Artificial daylight lamps
Thereby there are big differences at the young plants.
At the start the plant clearly grows much faster through the
morphological advantage, caused by the influence of the light
colours.
In a fully grown vegetation this effect doesn’t accure
anymore, because by then all the light is captured. Then the net-photosynthesis per unit leaf surface is important
first at all and that is –like said- for the 3 treatments
evenly.
The questions of course is now if it’s useful to hang
up this type of artificial sunlight in the glasshouse instead
of SON-T or LED’s (with which you can never offer a full
sunlight spectrum). This questions can not be answered for
this moment.
Especially by pre cultivate or by plant
material cultivation it could be very important.
And then especially in light poor periods, when the effect
of artificial light as added lightning counts the hardest.
But for now the most important advantage in this new technology
lies in scientific research.
The research for the influence of coloured LED’s as added
lightning for instance can now take place more directed.
Quicker research
By the way this whole story does not say that results of earlier
scientific test in climate chambers are questionable now. The
understanding of many physiologic processes in the plant can
develop itself without the daylight spectrum being offered.
This stays that way. But in the previous years became more obvious that light colour
has influence on the shape of the plant. That is now much better
to research. Also the application of a artificial daylight
spectrum can speed up the horticultural research enormously.
Researchers don’t have to do there tests in different
seasons in their glasshouses to research at different day lengths
and daylight intensities. The glasshouse situation for all seasons is at all time simulatable
with an artificial daylight spectrum.
Plasma Lamp
Recently a British/German company offers a Sulphur Plasma
lamp of which the spectrum comes closer to sunlight then all
the existing lamps.
Three quarters sits in the for the human eye visuable light between
400 and 700 nanometer. This lamp produces almost no ultraviolet
light and just a little infrared. The basics of the lamp are
a bulb Sulphur (with some other chemicals) that is heated up
to a glowing plasma with micro
radiation. The technology was already developed in the 90’s
by NASA and the American ministry of defense, but knew long
time no
commercial application.
The website www.plasma-i.com gives a clear view of the technical
status. The system is presented on the Hortifair in 2008.
To be clear: the spectrum of the lamp was corrected with filters
and extra lamps (by the research team in the Wageningen universities
department of horticulture) to come as close as possible to
actual sunlight.
Summary
In tests under artificial sunlight in a climate controlled
room it shows that young cucumber plants grow much better then
under SON-T or TL-light. That’s because
the colour of the light has influence on the shape of the plant. At
the right light colour the young plant is much more capable
of capturing light. Tests with artificial
daylight are only possible since recently. They are in great interest at the research with coloured LED’s
and can speed up horticultural research.
|